|
Recent blog entries:
Sitemap
|
9 days agoS3 Backup Release CandidateS3 Backup 1.0 first release candidate is now available. License management component is still to be added before 1.0 final release, but feature-wise it will be identical to this RC. The purpose of the release candidate is to make sure that the final release doesn’t contain any known bugs, and to do that, it has to be under feature-freeze for some time. That is the reason we are releasing it before the licensing is enabled. So please try it out and let us know if you encounter any problems. If no major issues are discovered we will have RC2 release later this week (which would include the license check), and the 1.0 final release the next week. Please also consider preordering the app before the final release. Starting with 1.0 new users will get a full-featured but time-limited license and everyone who preordered will get a full license automatically. We’ll have a separate blog entry detailing how our licensing system works before the release, but if you want to learn about it right now, you can contact customer support or ask in the comments section below. Changes in this release:
Some of the features were implemented but held back for a later release:
Download S3 Backup 1.0 RC1 and consider preordeing. 23 days agoWe won’t be getting into web services backup, but you canFirst of all, let me say that I’m not looking for investors in my company, so what follows is not a solicitation of funding, take it at face value. I’ve just read the news that Backupify got 900K in funding. Backupify is an online service that backups data from online accounts, mostly for various social services: Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, but also Gmail, Google Docs and a couple more. I’m happy for them, as Rob May is one of the few people around who have a healthy amount of skepticism, understand survivor bias etc. So I really wish his ventures to succeed — I’d like to see thoughtful approach rewarded, as I consider myself approaching things thoughtfully as well. What this investment tells me is that their field is perceived as ripe for the picking. The problem is that S3 Backup 1.0 is at the door and soon I’ll have my hands full promoting and further developing the app, then there’s a server edition, a Mac port and a lineup of related products waiting for their turn. So I can’t just add online service / social backup to the pile of “things I gotta do”. On the other hand, compared to the complexity of desktop software, all the cross-platform issues, GUI programming, filesystems quirks, don’t get me started... compared to all that online accounts backup is a very straightforward task. I’m not saying it’s easy, but all the complex things about it, I’ve already figured out in my previous and current projects. Also, it’s no secret that there’s more to business than technology, so even if I can do the tech part with my eyes closed, the business of it, that I don’t have the time or resources to get into. So here’s an idea: this is not in direct competition with that we do around here, so I don’t mind helping someone getting into that field. We would handle the initial development, you would make a business out of it. And it would cost you way less than 900K, too. Short version: if you want to get into online services backup business fast and with a competitive, scalable solution, drop us a line. - Sergey 4 weeks agoReview of New S3 Feature: VersioningToday Amazon announced support for versioning in S3. It’s exactly what one would expect from an AWS service — the feature set is very basic, but good at abstracting some of the lowest-level issues. Here’s a short review of what it is and what it’s not:
What this means for our productsWe have been working on our new S3 Backup storage logic for a while and even though it includes versioning, we don’t intend to change it to make use of this new functionality. The reason for this is that our take on the matter supports snapshots, has data deduplication, block-level diff and we would win nothing by using Amazon’s own versioning. Having said that, until our new storage logic is actually deployed in our products, we might enable limited support for using S3 versioning on a bucket and restoring the old versions of the files. There’s no time to get it done before 1.0 release, but if you really want to have this feature, let us know, we’ll use your feedback to schedule the implementation accordingly. 6 weeks agoS3 Backup beta 18: New file-dbThis version introduces a rewrite of one of the most important parts of the application — backup logic. This was made possible by redesigning a file-db component which I’ll explain in a later post. The new backup logic works by synchronizing two “virtual” filesystems created from the local one and S3-based one by filtering and reordering them based on backup rules. This affords some of long-requested features, for example, if you change the exclusion masks in some of your backup rules and the new mask excludes some files that were previously backed up, this change will not make the backup job delete the remote copy on next run. This isn’t a trivial matter — the app compares the local and remote storage and given that file mask it would not expect the filtered file on the remote storage, so the new system does well to make the correct decision in this and many other corner cases, like when a different backup jobs or different rules in the same backup job point to the same remote path. I’ll be later writing on the systems involved (file-db, rule indexing, virtual filesystems, filesystem middleware and more) so that users who are interested in the inner workings of the app have a better grasp of what doing a backup involves. Another very noticeable change in this version is faster backup job planning phase. We are working on even more speedups, but it’s already much faster than before. The app now also stores all the debug logs in your user settings folder. We will introduce online reports, notifications and reminders in a later version, but this should work for now. The file-db format had to be changed, so the first time you run the new version it will automatically be migrated. This happens momentarily and transactionally, so it cannot corrupt it. The log of the conversion is written in the logs folder in case you want to inspect it. You need to know that once it is migrated, the older version will not recognize it and during backups would believe all of the files need to be reuploaded. Basically, once you run beta 18 on a certain computer, do not try to use earlier version on it. If you have an older version installed on a different computer — it would not be influenced in any way, the file-db is local. The migration process is solid, but if you want to keep a copy of the older file-db, it’s stored in %appdata%/s3 backup/filedb.db The new file-db structure affords much faster operation which is used to ensure its consistency on-the-fly. This matters if you alter the remote storage via different app or from another computer. For example, if you have deleted some of the backed up files from S3 using a different app, the file-db would still think they are there and the next time backup is run, it would not reupload them. But in beta 18, if you browse to the folder where some of the files were removed, the app will immediately notice that they are missing and correct file-db accordingly. These actions are logged and can be seen in the debug log (from the main menu: Tools → Backup Log). The same happens when listing remote folders during normal backup operation, but not all folders are listed at that stage, so we’ll add a way to manually reindex remote storage, if there’s a need for that and to do it automatically at a schedule, just in case. The deletion propagation was disabled midway through the life of beta 17 and is now enabled again. Some more notes on this release:
If you come across any issues, please let us know and we’ll do our best to fix it ASAP. We are planning to make beta 19 a release candidate and have 1.0 version out in February, but you can order it while it’s still in beta and get a nice discount. 9 weeks agoS3 Backup beta 17Some changes in this release:
Beta 17 was done quite some time ago, but we decided against releasing it on holidays to make sure that if any issues crop up, we would be able to put any time necessary to fix it immediately. So even while we release beta 17 only now, beta 18 well underway already. The changes coming there will be related to the core backup algorithm that should make it yet faster especially for backup sets with huge amount of small files. Currently known issues:
If you come across any other issues, please let us know and we’ll do our best to fix it ASAP. This is release is part of our runup to a 1.0 release which gives you an opportunity to order it at a discount. See blog archives for more
|